Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Return to Dust

Originally I had written this for a short, short story contest (see rules here: http://www.npr.org/2012/03/10/148251671/three-minute-fiction-round-8-she-closed-the-book&sc=fb&cc=fp) but i miss read the deadline, by March 25, they did not mean March 29.  So, I am sharing it here instead.  I hope you enjoy.

Return to Dust
By Kevin Johnson


            She closed the book, placed it on the table, and finally decided to walk through the door.  Outside the wind had picked up, leaves blown across the dry lawn, bare branches twisted, flaying and dust swirling, ever present, filling space and time with grit.  Nothing was ever clean, dirt gathered beneath her fingernails and sifted through the course fabric of her cloths, the curtains and a box that protected the remnants of a life before this one; his photo in black and white to match the rented suit: sitting on the hood of an old car he had borrowed from a neighbor, her legs crossed in front of her, both smiling at the prospect of whatever lay before them and frightened, too, expectancy and pressure and the desire building up and focusing in on their bodies, just under the delicate feel of the short formal dress, the two of them budding and naïve, excited and afraid.  That photograph is simple in her memory as the newness of “she” was before reality – delusion, disappointment, life – chased away youth. 
 A worn and tarnished silver necklace with a small opal that caught the light and glimmered like a star; two ticket stubs and a little cash she would never spend, all covered in the dust that did not stop blowing with the wind or without it, always moving and sifting into places into which she could not believe dust could find.
 She stood at the door a long time, leaning against her cane, the final remnant of the man in the photo, never again able to smile like he had that night, on their way…she smoothed out her shirt, gnarled hand resting gently on her stomach, the traces who had made it and who hadn’t still lingered but there were no longer any tears for the dead or the living.   She was no longer sure upon which threshold she stood.
 With effort she stepped through the door and walked onto the porch, worn white oak creaking beneath her fragile frame, tentative steps, the tap of her cane, dust stirring, down the steps, onto the lawn, where she felt stronger, had always felt stronger on the ground and out, away from the business of living. 
 In the company of the walnut cane she walked through the yard and towards the hill that blocked out the ocean and the evening sun.
Had she been prone to sentiment it would have been a path of memories, faces staring from the ground, the blood of her body soaked into the soil and toil of a life they had built from ruin and ash into a comfort from which they could not escape, passion flaming into companionship and then into silence as he slipped away into the sea. 
She had watched from the top of the hill unable to speak or cry for help or rush to the edge with the intentions of salvation.  She was frozen in silence and later in grief and now she walked up the hill, a tree planted in his honor, its bare branches covered in dust, the grass brown beneath its gaze, how long had it been since she had stood beneath his cover and cried?
There were no longer any tears left.
She new that they wouldn’t understand, the faces that remained, they never did.
She sat against the rough bark allowed herself to finally fall asleep.

Monday, March 26, 2012

Thoughts on The Hunger Games

On Saturday night I went with a friend to see The Hunger Games.  In short it is set in a post apocalyptic North America in which the continent has been carved into 13 colonies.  As retaliation to a colonial uprising against the capitol colony the 12 other colonies give up two young people between the ages of 12 and 18 in a roman gladiator meets survivor arena called the Hunger Games.  The competition is to the death, the last child standing is the "winner".  (For a detailed synopsis go here:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hunger_Games_%28film%29).

Before I go any further I want to say that I have not read the book, by Susan Collins, upon which the film is based, so, keep that in mind as I reflect on the movie.

This is one of those stories, one of those movies, that has stuck with me and has a similar feel to The Giver, by Louis Lowry, both by it dark nature and the idea that the idealism and strength of children (or, minors in the case of The Hunger Games) can bring change against systems and ideals that marginalize and exploit their youth and vulnerability.

As far as the movie, directed by Gary Ross, goes, it is well done.  The acting is strong despite some weak points in the script and the hurried feel to the story at large.  Obviously there is more in the book and from a strictly movie stance this could easily have been two movies and given, I assume in ignorance (again, have not yet read the book), the themes in the story -- friendship, loyalty, family, the abuse of power, the spectacle of reality T.V. standing up for personal values and beliefs, et. al. -- a lot more time and attention.  As it is the movie is intensely gripping and drives forward with action from start to finish.

Lots of adventure movies are gripping and exciting but few bring home such powerful moral themes in such a vivid way.  The nature of the Hunger Games themselves are haunting, watching young adults not yet in puberty fight to the death with wounded lion ferocity is horrifying.  To see them compromise their personal values to survive for their families is both realistic and heart breaking, to watch a power hungry government exploit and capitalize on the innocence of children is sickening.  But this movie is worth it.

Yet, for my praise, I am troubled by the low PG-13 rating (so eloquently criticized by David Edelstien here:  http://www.npr.org/2012/03/22/148941034/acting-trumps-action-in-a-games-without-horror) and the fact that so many people, teens and adults alike, are watching The Hunger Games in the same fashion as the spectators in the movie, with a hunger for entertainment and sensationalized action.  These same people are going home to watch American Idol or Desperate Housewives or Survivor (is that still a show on T.V.?) or Deadly Catch or Ice Truckers or whatever-the-hell-people watch to find some sort of vicarious life outside their media programmed lives.

I am afraid we will miss the opportunity to have a conversation about what our lives look like, what we value as entertainment, what it means to stand up for who you are and what you believe irregardless of age, status, size, race, or sex.

The Hunger Games is a good movie with strong acting and a powerful story but does it go far enough?  I am not sure.